Platforms are on life support. Alternative AI interfaces are on the rise. Meta is shifting emphasis away from Facebook to AR- and VR-enabled portals for interaction. Mastodon is emerging as a friendlier, smaller-scale (for now) antidote to the mass interaction most platforms foster. Twitter has transitioned from serving as the PR instrument of President Trump to the pet project of a billionaire. People have begun to exit platforms en masse, leaving behind zombie accounts with many followers and no activity. They download content and lock up accounts. It almost feels like they’re locking up house and leaving hostile territory, hoping possibly to return when things are normal again, whatever that may mean. The people are leaving; the bots keep gaining ground.
Where does that leave journalism?
It’s time for journalists to rethink their relationships to platforms. Platforms are not neutral; they never were. They are technology, and per Kranzberg’s famous first law, technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral. Platforms are human-made and reflect the biases of their makers — in particular, of their owners. If journalists want to maintain their commitment to democracy, they must rethink their relationship to platforms that do little to strengthen democracy.
I’m not suggesting that journalists abandon platforms as a site of research and inquiry. However, if news institutions want to rebuild public trust around their mission, they’ll have to think critically about the places they take their business, and their readers, through.
News organizations rely on platforms to distribute content and drive back clicks to their sites. Leaving platforms is a complex decision for them. It’s a decision with economic repercussions. Staying on certain platforms, however, also has democratic consequences. Is it ethical for organizations that carry the crux of democracy to maintain an affiliation with platforms that don’t?
Community, trust, and authenticity do not scale up easily, if at all. As platforms expand, they lose the authenticity that rendered them unique. This isn’t inevitable: Responsible scaling can help platforms grow up and larger in a manner that preserves the affect that originally drew people to that platform. Contextual curation, consistent moderation, socialization to a platform, and etiquette are some practices that can help maintain the original atmosphere of interaction that a platform afforded. They can help preserve the sense of place, what Joshua Meyrowitz presciently described as the right balance between public and private that draws people in and fosters community and trust. But then again, community and trust aren’t things we create instantaneously or share in volume. We don’t trust everyone. We don’t feel close to everyone. We create our own places within larger spaces and thus render the closeness that hopefully will foster community.
As platforms continue to scale up, people’s connections to them will continue to thin out. Platforms will instead offer a Rolodex of contacts; an entry account to other spaces; a zombie account that collects dust like an abandoned house. They will become more vulnerable to content manipulation, engineered to support the whims of venture capital and stock market shorting. At present, the world watches as Elon Musk tweets content that seems tailor-made to test its effect on stock valuation. Musk follows a strategy that creates noise, estimating that this will maintain or increase perceptions of the value of the platform. And he further mocks news organizations for criticizing his practices yet remaining on his platform.
Why stay? Does the economic benefit really outweigh the reputational cost? The time seems opportune to leave and make a statement in so doing. What might shock the system more than all news institutions joining forces and leaving a platform like Twitter together?
If that seems like a lot, I’ll offer an alternative proposal.
In writing this piece, I asked ChatGPT to write me a manifesto for journalism. It offered a formulaic yet accurate treatise on fairness, objectivity, and democracy. The intelligence we create is tuned up to give us the responses we trained it to; does the world we live in fit that description? No. But what if news organizations trained their own conversational agents to engage in different modalities of news storytelling, ones that build on slower forms of news storytelling, like podcasts, that hold promise for building trust? I’m not suggesting that ChatGPT is not susceptible to manipulation, nor that we substitute conversational models for human interaction. I recommend that we optimize language models, like ChatGPT, to complement and augment our abilities instead of substituting; to help news institutions become more engaged in building platforms that are used to share the news, with a long-term investment in rebuilding trust, rather than a short-term interest in profit. Journalists can work together with social scientists and engineers to give these infrastructures the right architecture; the kind that turns a space into a place; the form that fosters trust, community, and accuracy. It’s not a prediction, but it is a challenge and an opportunity for the coming year.
Zizi Papacharissi is a professor of communication and political science at the University of Illinois Chicago).
Platforms are on life support. Alternative AI interfaces are on the rise. Meta is shifting emphasis away from Facebook to AR- and VR-enabled portals for interaction. Mastodon is emerging as a friendlier, smaller-scale (for now) antidote to the mass interaction most platforms foster. Twitter has transitioned from serving as the PR instrument of President Trump to the pet project of a billionaire. People have begun to exit platforms en masse, leaving behind zombie accounts with many followers and no activity. They download content and lock up accounts. It almost feels like they’re locking up house and leaving hostile territory, hoping possibly to return when things are normal again, whatever that may mean. The people are leaving; the bots keep gaining ground.
Where does that leave journalism?
It’s time for journalists to rethink their relationships to platforms. Platforms are not neutral; they never were. They are technology, and per Kranzberg’s famous first law, technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral. Platforms are human-made and reflect the biases of their makers — in particular, of their owners. If journalists want to maintain their commitment to democracy, they must rethink their relationship to platforms that do little to strengthen democracy.
I’m not suggesting that journalists abandon platforms as a site of research and inquiry. However, if news institutions want to rebuild public trust around their mission, they’ll have to think critically about the places they take their business, and their readers, through.
News organizations rely on platforms to distribute content and drive back clicks to their sites. Leaving platforms is a complex decision for them. It’s a decision with economic repercussions. Staying on certain platforms, however, also has democratic consequences. Is it ethical for organizations that carry the crux of democracy to maintain an affiliation with platforms that don’t?
Community, trust, and authenticity do not scale up easily, if at all. As platforms expand, they lose the authenticity that rendered them unique. This isn’t inevitable: Responsible scaling can help platforms grow up and larger in a manner that preserves the affect that originally drew people to that platform. Contextual curation, consistent moderation, socialization to a platform, and etiquette are some practices that can help maintain the original atmosphere of interaction that a platform afforded. They can help preserve the sense of place, what Joshua Meyrowitz presciently described as the right balance between public and private that draws people in and fosters community and trust. But then again, community and trust aren’t things we create instantaneously or share in volume. We don’t trust everyone. We don’t feel close to everyone. We create our own places within larger spaces and thus render the closeness that hopefully will foster community.
As platforms continue to scale up, people’s connections to them will continue to thin out. Platforms will instead offer a Rolodex of contacts; an entry account to other spaces; a zombie account that collects dust like an abandoned house. They will become more vulnerable to content manipulation, engineered to support the whims of venture capital and stock market shorting. At present, the world watches as Elon Musk tweets content that seems tailor-made to test its effect on stock valuation. Musk follows a strategy that creates noise, estimating that this will maintain or increase perceptions of the value of the platform. And he further mocks news organizations for criticizing his practices yet remaining on his platform.
Why stay? Does the economic benefit really outweigh the reputational cost? The time seems opportune to leave and make a statement in so doing. What might shock the system more than all news institutions joining forces and leaving a platform like Twitter together?
If that seems like a lot, I’ll offer an alternative proposal.
In writing this piece, I asked ChatGPT to write me a manifesto for journalism. It offered a formulaic yet accurate treatise on fairness, objectivity, and democracy. The intelligence we create is tuned up to give us the responses we trained it to; does the world we live in fit that description? No. But what if news organizations trained their own conversational agents to engage in different modalities of news storytelling, ones that build on slower forms of news storytelling, like podcasts, that hold promise for building trust? I’m not suggesting that ChatGPT is not susceptible to manipulation, nor that we substitute conversational models for human interaction. I recommend that we optimize language models, like ChatGPT, to complement and augment our abilities instead of substituting; to help news institutions become more engaged in building platforms that are used to share the news, with a long-term investment in rebuilding trust, rather than a short-term interest in profit. Journalists can work together with social scientists and engineers to give these infrastructures the right architecture; the kind that turns a space into a place; the form that fosters trust, community, and accuracy. It’s not a prediction, but it is a challenge and an opportunity for the coming year.
Zizi Papacharissi is a professor of communication and political science at the University of Illinois Chicago).
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action