It sounds terrible, I know. Nobody likes PR, and its longstanding effects on journalism have been unquestionably catastrophic. But today, as the populist right takes over the conversation about news and its role within society by bashing journalists and inciting against “the media,” it’s become inescapable: This year, journalists must start campaigning for journalism.
Research conducted in recent years indicates that the anti-media rhetoric and delegitimizing techniques embraced by right-wing elites worldwide affect and polarize public perceptions of the media, undermining its ability to hold those in power accountable. No less important, it also transforms the way journalists work, encouraging self-censorship and what I call “strategic bias” — an intentional shift to the right. In other words, it’s a disaster, both for journalists’ daily lives (which have changed dramatically over the past few years) and for the news we consume.
Initial evidence suggests that making counter-arguments to the baseless accusations against critical journalism is crucial if one is to maintain — or regain — the public’s trust in the news media. But much too often, journalists refrain from making such explicit arguments, worrying that they might portray them as biased and self-interested. Keeping quiet — hoping that the public sees the populist strategy for what it is, or waiting for these dark days to pass — has not been proven useful, in Israel, in the U.S., or elsewhere.
To be clear, what I mean by PR is not the personal self-promotion that journalists do on social media. It’s the commitment to promote and explain journalism as a flawed-yet-necessary social institution. As media-savvy journalists should know, vague arguments about “saving democracy” or “checks and balances” won’t do; they’re too abstract and carry little sentimental resonance for many. So what would a wiser PR strategy look like?
If journalists genuinely believe that journalism is essential for society, they shouldn’t shy away from saying exactly how and why. Dear reporter, editor, and news host: How have you actually contributed to people’s everyday life this past year? What have you done to expose discrimination, corruption, or exploitation? How does your work protect us against disinformation operations or voter suppression?
How about publishing accessible “annual reports,” where journalists tell their audiences simply and directly how their reporting has been helpful this year? How have real people benefited from your reporting? What did you do for the community? If “the watchdog of democracy” remains a vague term with little to do with people’s lives, no one will care when it crumbles.
Educating the public about the role of journalism in society requires deliberate efforts and sincerity, and that’s easier said than done. But there’s no way around it: The risk is just too great, and other strategies have been proven futile. Even if the media industry takes urgent steps like diversifying newsrooms and empowering local media, the populist media bashing won’t go away. Ignoring it is not a sustainable way forward.
For all their flaws, the majority of the journalists I speak to genuinely and overwhelmingly believe in journalism. However, they don’t usually stop to ask themselves why — and they certainly don’t turn to discuss it with their audiences.
Educating people on what journalism is and should be — how it benefits ordinary people every day, what it can save us from — should be the job of vital democratic education, not journalists. At the moment, however, this type of education doesn’t exist in many democratic societies. Journalists can no longer wait for others to change it. Neither can we. Journalists should lead the way, but those among us who still believe in it should follow suit.
By advocating for journalism, we would gain another substantial side benefit: re-orienting the news media to the real-world concrete value that they contribute to society. What is it that is so important about your work? And what did you really achieve for the people you claim to serve at the end of the day?
For too many years, ratings and traffic replaced journalists’ concerns with the added value they provide to their audiences. By trying to deliver PR for journalism, journalists might find that they themselves should dramatically alter their priorities, if they are to make a public case for journalism and why it (still) matters.
Ayala Panievsky is a Ph.D. student in sociology at the University of Cambridge.
It sounds terrible, I know. Nobody likes PR, and its longstanding effects on journalism have been unquestionably catastrophic. But today, as the populist right takes over the conversation about news and its role within society by bashing journalists and inciting against “the media,” it’s become inescapable: This year, journalists must start campaigning for journalism.
Research conducted in recent years indicates that the anti-media rhetoric and delegitimizing techniques embraced by right-wing elites worldwide affect and polarize public perceptions of the media, undermining its ability to hold those in power accountable. No less important, it also transforms the way journalists work, encouraging self-censorship and what I call “strategic bias” — an intentional shift to the right. In other words, it’s a disaster, both for journalists’ daily lives (which have changed dramatically over the past few years) and for the news we consume.
Initial evidence suggests that making counter-arguments to the baseless accusations against critical journalism is crucial if one is to maintain — or regain — the public’s trust in the news media. But much too often, journalists refrain from making such explicit arguments, worrying that they might portray them as biased and self-interested. Keeping quiet — hoping that the public sees the populist strategy for what it is, or waiting for these dark days to pass — has not been proven useful, in Israel, in the U.S., or elsewhere.
To be clear, what I mean by PR is not the personal self-promotion that journalists do on social media. It’s the commitment to promote and explain journalism as a flawed-yet-necessary social institution. As media-savvy journalists should know, vague arguments about “saving democracy” or “checks and balances” won’t do; they’re too abstract and carry little sentimental resonance for many. So what would a wiser PR strategy look like?
If journalists genuinely believe that journalism is essential for society, they shouldn’t shy away from saying exactly how and why. Dear reporter, editor, and news host: How have you actually contributed to people’s everyday life this past year? What have you done to expose discrimination, corruption, or exploitation? How does your work protect us against disinformation operations or voter suppression?
How about publishing accessible “annual reports,” where journalists tell their audiences simply and directly how their reporting has been helpful this year? How have real people benefited from your reporting? What did you do for the community? If “the watchdog of democracy” remains a vague term with little to do with people’s lives, no one will care when it crumbles.
Educating the public about the role of journalism in society requires deliberate efforts and sincerity, and that’s easier said than done. But there’s no way around it: The risk is just too great, and other strategies have been proven futile. Even if the media industry takes urgent steps like diversifying newsrooms and empowering local media, the populist media bashing won’t go away. Ignoring it is not a sustainable way forward.
For all their flaws, the majority of the journalists I speak to genuinely and overwhelmingly believe in journalism. However, they don’t usually stop to ask themselves why — and they certainly don’t turn to discuss it with their audiences.
Educating people on what journalism is and should be — how it benefits ordinary people every day, what it can save us from — should be the job of vital democratic education, not journalists. At the moment, however, this type of education doesn’t exist in many democratic societies. Journalists can no longer wait for others to change it. Neither can we. Journalists should lead the way, but those among us who still believe in it should follow suit.
By advocating for journalism, we would gain another substantial side benefit: re-orienting the news media to the real-world concrete value that they contribute to society. What is it that is so important about your work? And what did you really achieve for the people you claim to serve at the end of the day?
For too many years, ratings and traffic replaced journalists’ concerns with the added value they provide to their audiences. By trying to deliver PR for journalism, journalists might find that they themselves should dramatically alter their priorities, if they are to make a public case for journalism and why it (still) matters.
Ayala Panievsky is a Ph.D. student in sociology at the University of Cambridge.
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism